Those who came before us

On the old plans of the manor, which survived the fire when so much else burned, there is a name that appears everywhere. Traced in ink, in a careful, slanting hand, in the margins of the architect's drawings. Bordier. For weeks, that name was nothing to us but an anonymous signature on yellowed paper. And then, thanks to you, thanks to those among you who searched the archives, cross-checked the census records, traced the deeds, that name became a life. Several lives, in truth. A whole line of inhabitants of whom we are only the latest.

It all began with Alphonse Bordier.

In 1887, Alphonse was a grocer in Paris. A grocer, that is to say a man of ordinary trade, one of those who weigh coffee and count change, not one of those whose names history keeps. In principle. That year, he married Adolphine Marguerite Camus, whom the records describe as the daughter of a propriétaire.

It is worth pausing on that word, because it says a great deal. In nineteenth-century France, propriétaire was not a mere description on a form. It was a social condition. It designated those who lived on the income of what they owned, land, tenancies, rents, without practising a trade. Landed gentry, in essence, of the kind an English reader knows from the pages of Austen. To say that Adolphine was the daughter of a propriétaire is to say that she came from a more comfortable world than Alphonse the grocer. And it is to say, too, what most likely made the manor possible. For according to the custom of the time, it was Adolphine's dowry, the portion a woman of that class brought into her marriage, that financed the construction. The manor was not born of Alphonse's trade. It was born of her. Of what she brought, of her world, of her family. It was she who, in marrying a grocer, gave him the means to build a manor.

And that is what makes what follows so poignant. For Adolphine never saw the manor finished. She died in 1911, at forty-four, just before the works were completed. The house she had made possible, the house she had financed with her inheritance, she never lived in it. The couple who had imagined this home together never, in the end, lived in it together. Alphonse found himself a widower in a house he owed to his wife, a house that became, from the day it was finished, the monument of her absence.

It took us a long time to absorb that story. Because it resonates, you will understand, in a particular way with ours. We too bought this manor imagining a precise future: a wedding, a life, years ahead. We too watched that future falter, one November night. Alphonse's loss is not ours, and we would not compare ourselves to a man who lost his wife. But there is something, in discovering that the first stone of this house was laid upon a grief, that shook us deeply. As though the manor had always known, from the very beginning, that it would be a place where one learns to carry on despite what is missing.

The archives tell us that in 1926, Alphonse was still living in Paris, still a widower, no longer working, with his daughter Madeleine, a piano teacher. We like to imagine that Parisian house filled with the scales and arpeggios of a young woman, and that ageing father listening, seated somewhere, thinking perhaps of the country house and of the woman who never had the time to live in it. Alphonse passed away in 1948, at eighty-seven.

It is then that the Oudeyer family enters the story of the manor.

Edgar Oudeyer was a farmer of considerable standing, well known throughout the region, a man who created a great many jobs around him. Under him, the manor changed its nature. What had been a house of leisure became the heart of a working farm. The gardens themselves were turned into cultivated land. Men and women worked there, planted there, harvested all manner of things. And it is here, suddenly, that something found its explanation. When we arrived, the garden had gone back to the wild, almost a forest, and it took us weeks of work simply to clear it. We thought we were dealing with simple neglect. We understand now that we were walking on old farmland, on a century of cultivation returned to wilderness. The disorder we were fighting had a memory.

Monsieur Oudeyer lived to a great age. Past a hundred, a widower himself, yet another widower in this house that seems to collect them, he no longer had the strength to maintain such a property. He passed away in 2024. And it was his three children who, a few months later, sold us the manor.

So there is the chain of which we are the last link. Alphonse and Adolphine, who dreamed it and built it without ever living in it together. Madeleine and her scales. Edgar Oudeyer and his century of harvests. And now us, whose surname, and this is almost funny, is Petitpas. Little steps, in French. The last to arrive, placing our small steps in the footprints of all these people.

There is a thought that has never left us since we learned this story. We believed we had bought a house. In truth, we inherited a relay. This manor does not really belong to us, any more than it belonged to Alphonse or to Edgar. We are its temporary keepers, for the length of a life, charged with passing it on in our turn. The fire did not break that chain. It only reminded us, brutally, that our task was never to possess this place, but to carry it across time. Like the others before us. Like those who will come after.

Until next Sunday,
Dimitri & David

✦ ✦ ✦

P.S. In a future letter, we will come back to the name Egmont, and you will understand why Adolphine's role resonates so deeply with us.

Keep Reading